Systematic Reviews for Policymaking: Muddling Through
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
MUDdling Through
The worlds project is concerned with developing next-generation collaboration frameworks. We strohgly believe that real progress in enhancing the usability of collaborative systems hinges on improving our understanding of work, and applying the resulting insights to development of collaborative work support frameworks. We are investigating the thesis that appropriate bases for such an approach ...
متن کاملMuddling Through: Noisy Equilibrium Selection
This paper examines an evolutionary model in which the primary source of ``noise'' that moves the model between equilibria is not arbitrarily improbable mutations but mistakes in learning. We model strategy selection as a birth death process, allowing us to find a simple, closed-form solution for the stationary distribution. We examine equilibrium selection by considering the limiting case as t...
متن کاملMuddling Through: Noisy Equilibrium Selection1
This paper examines an evolutionary model in which the primary source of \noise" that moves the model between equilibria is not arbitrarily improbable mutations but mistakes in learning. We model strategy selection as a birth-death process, allowing us to ̄nd a simple, closed-form solution for the stationary distribution of the model even though we take the noise to be bounded away from zero. W...
متن کاملSUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews
This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. Systematic reviews are increasingly seen as a key source of information in policymaking, particularly in terms of assisting with descriptions of the impacts of options. Relative to single studies they offer a number of advanta...
متن کاملSystematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews
Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews es...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Public Health
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0090-0036,1541-0048
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2016.303557